Agricultural intensification: will land spared from farming be land spared for nature?

نویسندگان

  • Pamela A Matson
  • Peter M Vitousek
چکیده

How can intensive agricultural systems be designed so that they have fewer and smaller impacts on surrounding ecosystems? This is not a new challenge, but its importance to conservation—particularly in developing regions—has become apparent in recent years. This challenge is a major part of the ongoing effort to provide for the needs of a growing human population and at the same time sustain the life-support systems of the planet (Vitousek et al. 1997; National Resource Council 1999). To many in the conservation community, a growing human population makes the goal of harmonizing food production and conservation all but impossible. That psychological landscape has changed fundamentally, however— the end of human population growth is within sight over most of Earth (the peak population will be realized sooner and at a lower level with intensified, committed effort). Nevertheless, population will continue to grow for some decades. In many areas, standards of living and levels of nutrition will (and should) increase. What are the best ways to meet the dual challenges of agricultural production and conservation? Many agronomists suggest that the best way to meet those challenges is through intensifying agriculture and increasing yields on the “best” lands. That way, the necessary production can be obtained on the smallest area of land and more land can be “saved for nature” (Waggoner 1995). Intensification leading to increased yields per hectare provided most of the last doubling of agricultural production—and the potential for another doubling in yields now attracts both debate and research. An alternative pathway by which agricultural production and conservation could be harmonized is wildlife-friendly farming, which involves designing agricultural systems so that they support important components of biological diversity within the agricultural landscape itself. Recent analyses by Green et al. (2005) and Balmford et al. (2005) evaluated these alternatives regionally and

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Agricultural Intensification Exacerbates Spillover Effects on Soil Biogeochemistry in Adjacent Forest Remnants

Land-use intensification is a central element in proposed strategies to address global food security. One rationale for accepting the negative consequences of land-use intensification for farmland biodiversity is that it could 'spare' further expansion of agriculture into remaining natural habitats. However, in many regions of the world the only natural habitats that can be spared are fragments...

متن کامل

Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification

Under the current scenario of rapid human population increase, achieving efficient and productive agricultural land use while conserving biodiversity is a global challenge. There is an ongoing debate whether land for nature and for production should be segregated (land sparing) or integrated on the same land (land sharing, wildlife-friendly farming). While recent studies argue for agricultural ...

متن کامل

Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970-2005.

Does the intensification of agriculture reduce cultivated areas and, in so doing, spare some lands by concentrating production on other lands? Such sparing is important for many reasons, among them the enhanced abilities of released lands to sequester carbon and provide other environmental services. Difficulties measuring the extent of spared land make it impossible to investigate fully the hyp...

متن کامل

Measuring the planet to fill terrestrial data gaps.

H ow a growing world population can sustain itself on Planet Earth has been the focus of much research. Norman Borlaug (1), the ‘‘father of the Green Revolution,’’ argued that one answer is to intensify agriculture to produce more food on the same area of land. But what he promoted as a policy strategy, others have called the ‘‘Borlaug hypothesis,’’ aiming to add it to sustainability science th...

متن کامل

Agricultural intensification escalates future conservation costs.

The supposition that agricultural intensification results in land sparing for conservation has become central to policy formulations across the tropics. However, underlying assumptions remain uncertain and have been little explored in the context of conservation incentive schemes such as policies for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation, conservation, sustainable managem...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology

دوره 20 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006